"Plaintiff Benchmark brings this action to redress the fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and breaches of contractual obligations perpetrated by Kalanick, the former CEO of Uber, to entrench himself on Uber's Board of Directors and increase his power for his own selfish ends," states the complaint.
Benchmark also claims that the former CEO promised to only fill the remaining two seats with full board approval, but that he has not made the changes official via an amended voting agreement. Should the June 2016 stockholder vote — which created the three new board seats — be invalidated as per the lawsuit, then Kalankick would no longer be on Uber's board. Benchmark Capital is also seeking a preliminary injunction against any involvement in the company's board by Kalanick. This would also make it so he could not be considered for the currently open CEO position. Uber has declined to comment on this matter.